Summary for Test 2020-02-03-10-3
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 214681 DEA: 021H5104 EFIS: 0216000148 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 02-TEH-99-9.0/9.3 |
Award Date | 11/04/2021 |
Closeout Date | 08/14/2023 |
Work Description | CHAMPLIN SLOUGH |
Location Description | REPLACE BRIDGE IN TEHAMA COUNTY NEAR LOS MOLINOS FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH TO 0.2 MILE NORTH OF CHAMPLIN SLOUGH |
QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 03/02/2020) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 02/03/2020 | Sample Unique Key | 10 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 02/04/2020 |
Sample type | Preliminary | A brief description of the sample | Soil |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | Structural Section Recomendation | From where was the sample collected | Job Site |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | Brian | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Steiner |
Title of sampler | AAME | Telephone number of sampler | |
Laboratory sample identification | D78326 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | In Situ | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | 824578 |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||
Structure name |
Material Information
Material Type | Soil | The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | 02-TEH-99-9.25, Embankment, 0.5 - 1.0 foot Depth |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-03-10
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-03-10-3
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2020-02-19
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Ward Jenkins
Date of test: 02/07/2020
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 90 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 76 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 64 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 55 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 49 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 44 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 40 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 37 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 34 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 88 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 81 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 76 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 65 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 58 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 52 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 47 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 43 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 40 %
R value: 8
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Raw data input requires horizontal pressure and displacement at exactly 300 psi exhudation pressure. Does not interpolate data for the result.
Test was verified on 2/19/2020 ✔