Test 2020-02-07-8-1 (AASHTO T27-14) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 209695
DEA: 08347704
EFIS: 0800000616
DIST-CO-RTE-PM08-SBD-SR-58-0/12.9
Work Description(Alternative Delivery) The CMGC project will upgrade SR 58 from 2- to 4-lanes in San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395.
Location DescriptionSR-58 / 395 Kramer Junction project. In San Bernardino County from the Kern County line to 7.5 miles east of US-395.
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date2/7/2020 Sample Unique Key8
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing2/10/2020
Sample typeVerification A brief description of the sample3/4 HMA-A-SP R15
The quantity of what the sample constitutesPSUE 23 Bags From where was the sample collectedManufacturer
First name of sampler or witnessed byVulcan Oro Grande Last name of sampler or witnessed byQC
Title of sampler Laboratory sample identification0127A-20
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameVulcan Oro Grande Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifier
Structure name
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Calmat, Lucerene Valley, Oro Grande
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample3/4 HMA-A-SP R15 The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample224113 ORO SJR
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedBelt Cut at Vulcan Oro Grande Plant
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberUnknown
Sublot numberUnknown JMF Verification ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2020-02-07-8
DIME Test ID: 2020-02-07-8-1
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: AASHTO T27-14: Standard Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Sieve Analysis)
Test Release Date: 2020-03-17
Test Results

What type of gradation is being tested?: HMA Gradation
Does this test use 1/4 sieve? (question for HMA Gradation Type): No
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Edmond Jabbour, Michael Magana
Date of test: 02/12/2020
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve:100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve:97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve:78 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve:64 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve:47 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve:35 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve:24 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve:15 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve:9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve:5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve:3.3 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Lime Treated Aggregate Gradation

Test was verified on 03/17/2020