## Summary for Test 2019-02-22-15-4

Test performed: ASTM D4791-10## Project Information

Project Identifiers | Project ID: 99999DEA: 0322222 |
---|---|

DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 03-SAC,OMG-888,99,80-0.6-0.6 |

Award Date | Not set |

Closeout Date | Not set |

Work Description | THIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. |

Location Description | THIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. |

QA Service Level | (Verified on 04/05/2013) |

## Sample Information

Sample Taken Date | 02/22/2019 | Sample Unique Key | 15 |
---|---|---|---|

Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | No | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 02/22/2019 |

Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | 1/2" Virgin Aggregate |

The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF Verification | From where was the sample collected | Source |

First name of sampler or witnessed by | Dan | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Weaver |

Title of sampler | Telephone number of sampler | ||

Laboratory sample identification | 19-J-002 | Linked DIME Sample ID | |

The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Sierra Pacific - Avenal | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | C955245 |

Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | ||

Structure name |

## Material Information

Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit) | 91-10-0006 |
---|---|---|---|

The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | ||

The plant number | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Source | |

Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 1/2 inch | |

The concrete mix design number | Lot number | ||

Sublot number | JMF Verification ID | JMF3513-2019-91 |

## Test Details

DIME Sample ID: 2019-02-22-15

DIME Test ID: 2019-02-22-15-4

Testing Lab: CT HQ - Hot Mix Asphalt Laboratory

Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)

Test Release Date: 2019-12-31

#### Test Results

Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles

Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles

Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: A

Determination: By Mass

Dimensional ratio used: 1:5

Input Type: Measured

Tester's full name: Clinton Edmiston

Date of test: 02/22/2019

Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 0 %

Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 17 %

Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 33 %

Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 17 %

Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 0 %

Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 500 g

Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 2 g

Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 298 g

Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 1 g

Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 99 g

Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat: 0 g

Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 g

Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 g

Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 100 %

Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 1 %

Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 99 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were both flat and elongated: 1 %

Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 99 %

Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were both flat and elongated: 0 %

Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were neither flat nor elongated: 0 %

Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat:0 %

Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were elongated:0 %

Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were both flat and elongated:1 %

Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were neither flat nor elongated:99 %

General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 12/31/2019 ✔