Test 2014-08-19-8-4 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 7613
DEA: 071218W4
EFIS: 0700021119
DIST-CO-RTE-PM07-LA-5-29.4/31.6
Work DescriptionREALIGN ROUTE 5 AND RAILROAD TRACKS AND RECONFIGURE ON- AND OFF-RAMPS.
Location DescriptionLOS ANGELES COUNTY IN BURBANK FROM WEST MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD OVERCROSSING TO 0.3 MILE NORTH OF BUENA VISTA STREET/WINONA AVENUE UNDERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date8/19/2014 Sample Unique Key8
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing8/19/2014
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 3 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes1 Bucket From where was the sample collectedSource
First name of sampler or witnessed byDan Last name of sampler or witnessed byChapman
Title of samplerUnknown Laboratory sample identification4235B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameUnknown Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberUnknown
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) FormUnknown Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleUnknown
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collected210 Fwy crushing site west of Latunga Canyon
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2014-08-19-8
DIME Test ID: 2014-08-19-8-4
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-20
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By expansion pressure
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 08/25/2014
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 97 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 78 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 67 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 50 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 37 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 29 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 22 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 16 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 11 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 7 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 80 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 69 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 52 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 38 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 30 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 23 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 16 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 11 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 7.3 %
R value:76
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):

Test was verified on 02/20/2015