Test 2014-07-30-5304336-4 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 7428
DEA: 07215944
EFIS: 0700001834
DIST-CO-RTE-PM07-LA-5-4.0/5.9
Work DescriptionRECONSTRUCT AND WIDEN FREEWAY AND UNDERCROSSING STRUCTURES.
Location DescriptionLOS ANGELES COUNTY IN NORWALK FROM 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF SAN ANTONIO DRIVE UNDERCROSSING TO 0.7 MILE NORTH OF PIONEER BOULEVARD UNDERCROSSING
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date7/30/2014 Sample Unique Key5304336
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing7/30/2014
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 2 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 Bags From where was the sample collectedSource
First name of sampler or witnessed byMalik Last name of sampler or witnessed byAli
Title of samplerAssistant RE Laboratory sample identification4207B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name5 NB Offramp to Norwalk Blvd Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)Unknown
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample
The plant number A detailed description of where the material sample was collected5 NB Offramp to Norwalk Blvd
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2014-07-30-5304336
DIME Test ID: 2014-07-30-5304336-4
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-20
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By expansion pressure
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 08/08/2014
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 91 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 72 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 60 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 39 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 30 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 25 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 19 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 13 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 8 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 5.9 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 79 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 66 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 43 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 34 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 27 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 21 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 15 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 9 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 6.5 %
R value:81
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 250 characters):

Test was verified on 02/20/2015