Test 2018-01-12-5-9 (ASTM D4791-10) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 99999
DEA: 0322222
DIST-CO-RTE-PM03-SAC,OMG-888,99,80-0.6-0.6
Work DescriptionTHIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES.
Location DescriptionTHIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES.
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date1/12/2018 Sample Unique Key5
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing1/12/2018
Sample typeVerification A brief description of the sampleCombined, Untreated, 3/4-inch Type A
The quantity of what the sample constitutesJMF From where was the sample collectedManufacturer
First name of sampler or witnessed bya Last name of sampler or witnessed bya
Title of samplerUnknown Laboratory sample identificationUnknown
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameSNC - Mustang Asphalt Plant Transportation Laboratory (TL) NumberUnknown
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) FormUnknown Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)MSHA IDs 2602089 and 2602404
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleUnknown The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample5202
The plant numberUnknown A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedLab-batched from untreated stockpiles
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledUnknown Primary Aggregate Nominal Size3/4 inch
The concrete mix design numberUnknown Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set JMF Verification ID JMF3513-2018-7
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2018-01-12-5
DIME Test ID: 2018-01-12-5-9
Testing Lab: CT D02 - North Region Materials Lab
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2018-03-22
Test Results

Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles

Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 1:5
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Ward Jenkins
Date of test: 01/17/2018
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 2.3 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 14.6 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 24.5 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 43 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 52.8 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 616.3 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.1 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 201.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 75.9 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 23.9 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated:0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated:98 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Why is 2 percent of the sample not flat and elongated and not not flat and elongated question mark

Test was verified on 03/15/2018