Summary for Test 2018-01-12-5-9
Test performed: ASTM D4791-10Project Information
Project Identifiers | Project ID: 99999 DEA: 0322222 |
---|---|
DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 03-SAC,OMG-888,99,80-0.6-0.6 |
Award Date | Not set |
Closeout Date | Not set |
Work Description | THIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. |
Location Description | THIS PROJECT RECORD WAS ADDED FOR DIME TESTERS - DATA SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. |
QA Service Level | (Verified on 04/05/2013) |
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date | 01/12/2018 | Sample Unique Key | 5 |
---|---|---|---|
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 01/12/2018 |
Sample type | Verification | A brief description of the sample | Combined, Untreated, 3/4-inch Type A |
The quantity of what the sample constitutes | JMF | From where was the sample collected | Manufacturer |
First name of sampler or witnessed by | a | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | a |
Title of sampler | Unknown | Telephone number of sampler | Unknown |
Laboratory sample identification | Unknown | Linked DIME Sample ID | Unknown |
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | SNC - Mustang Asphalt Plant | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | Unknown |
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Unknown | Structure unique identifier | Not set |
Structure name | Not set |
Material Information
Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | MSHA IDs 2602089 and 2602404 |
---|---|---|---|
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Unknown | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | 5202 |
The plant number | Unknown | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Lab-batched from untreated stockpiles |
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Unknown | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | 3/4 inch |
The concrete mix design number | Unknown | Lot number | Not set |
Sublot number | Not set | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2018-01-12-5
DIME Test ID: 2018-01-12-5-9
Testing Lab: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Test Release Date: 2018-03-22
Test Results
Method A - Percentage of Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, and Flat & Elongated Particles
Method B - Flat & Elongated Particles
Method: B
Determination: By Mass
Dimensional ratio used: 1:5
Input Type: Measured
Tester's full name: Ward Jenkins
Date of test: 01/17/2018
Percentage on the 6 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 5 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 4 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 3 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 2 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 ½ inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the 1 inch sieve: 0 %
Percentage on the ¾ inch sieve: 2.3 %
Percentage on the ½ inch sieve: 14.6 %
Percentage on the ⅜ inch sieve: 24.5 %
Percentage on the ¼ inch sieve: 43 %
Percentage on the No. 4 sieve: 52.8 %
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 616.3 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1.1 g
Mass grams of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 201.7 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 75.9 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 g
Mass grams of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 23.9 g
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 6 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 5 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 4 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 3 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 2 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of 1 inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¾ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ½ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 1 %
Percentage (by mass) of ⅜ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 99 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of ¼ inch particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Percentage (by mass) of No. 4 particles that were not flat and elongated: 100 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated: 0 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated: 98 %
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters): Why is 2 percent of the sample not flat and elongated and not not flat and elongated question mark
Test was verified on 3/15/2018 ✔