Summary for Test 2013-09-24-9998-2
Test performed: CTM 301-March 2000Project Information
| Project Identifiers | Project ID: 3958 DEA: 07215914 EFIS: 0700001831 |
|---|---|
| DIST-CO-RTE-PM | 07-LA-5-1.2/2.1 |
| Award Date | 12/31/1969 |
| Closeout Date | 06/14/2016 |
| Work Description | WIDEN AND REALIGN FREEWAY AND RECONSTRUCT OVERCROSSING STRUCTURE. |
| Location Description | LOS ANGELES COUNTY IN SANTA FE SPRINGS FROM 0.3 MILE SOUTH OF NORTH FORK COYOTE CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.3 MILE NORTH OF MARQUARDT AVENUE AND AT NORWALK HUB AND LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CENTER |
| QA Service Level | 1 (Verified on 05/01/2012) |
Sample Information
| Sample Taken Date | 09/24/2013 | Sample Unique Key | 9998 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample? | Yes | Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing | 09/24/2013 |
| Sample type | Acceptance | A brief description of the sample | Class 3 Aggregate Base |
| The quantity of what the sample constitutes | 2 bags | From where was the sample collected | Other |
| First name of sampler or witnessed by | Not set | Last name of sampler or witnessed by | Not set |
| Title of sampler | Not set | Telephone number of sampler | Not set |
| Laboratory sample identification | 3242B | Linked DIME Sample ID | Not set |
| The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name | Windrows placed on Proposed Mainline | Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number | |
| Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form | Structure unique identifier | Not set | |
| Structure name | Not set |
Material Information
| Material Type | Aggregate | Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site) | NA |
|---|---|---|---|
| The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample | Class 3 Aggregate Base | The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample | Not set |
| The plant number | Not set | A detailed description of where the material sample was collected | Windrows placed on Proposed Mainline. |
| Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled | Not set | Primary Aggregate Nominal Size | |
| The concrete mix design number | Lot number | Not set | |
| Sublot number | Not set | Aggregate Mix Number | Not set |
Test Details
Test Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Test Details view on another device.
Sample Details QR Code
Scan this code to open this Sample Details view on another device.
DIME Sample ID: 2013-09-24-9998
DIME Test ID: 2013-09-24-9998-2
Testing Lab: CT D08 - Fontana Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method for Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-19
Test Results
How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 09/30/2013
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 74 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 58 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 45 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 34 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 24 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 17 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 10 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 87 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 80 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 62 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 48 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 36 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 25 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 18 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 13 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 11 %
R value: 82
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 1000 characters):
Test was verified on 2/19/2015 ✔