Test 2013-09-24-9998-2 (CTM 301-March 2000) Summary

Project Information
Project IdentifiersProject ID: 3958
DEA: 07215914
EFIS: 0700001831
DIST-CO-RTE-PM07-LA-5-1.2/2.1
Work DescriptionWIDEN AND REALIGN FREEWAY AND RECONSTRUCT OVERCROSSING STRUCTURE.
Location DescriptionLOS ANGELES COUNTY IN SANTA FE SPRINGS FROM 0.3 MILE SOUTH OF NORTH FORK COYOTE CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.3 MILE NORTH OF MARQUARDT AVENUE AND AT NORWALK HUB AND LOS ANGELES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT CENTER
Sample Information
Sample Taken Date9/24/2013 Sample Unique Key9998
Will the laboratory/organization for which you are a member perform testing on this material sample?Yes Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing9/24/2013
Sample typeAcceptance A brief description of the sampleClass 3 Aggregate Base
The quantity of what the sample constitutes2 bags From where was the sample collectedOther
First name of sampler or witnessed byNot set Last name of sampler or witnessed byNot set
Title of samplerNot set Laboratory sample identification3242B
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility nameWindrows placed on Proposed Mainline Transportation Laboratory (TL) Number
Inspector Lot Number from the Transportation Laboratory (TL) Form Structure unique identifierNot set
Structure nameNot set
Material Information
Material TypeAggregate Source Identification (SMARA or name of Pit)NA
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sampleClass 3 Aggregate Base The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sampleNot set
The plant numberNot set A detailed description of where the material sample was collectedWindrows placed on Proposed Mainline.
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampledNot set Primary Aggregate Nominal Size
The concrete mix design number Lot numberNot set
Sublot numberNot set HMA Design ID
Test Details
DIME Sample ID: 2013-09-24-9998
DIME Test ID: 2013-09-24-9998-2
Testing Lab: CT - Southern Regional Laboratory
Test Method: CTM 301-March 2000: Method of Test for Determining the Resistance "R"; Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabilometer
Test Release Date: 2015-02-19
Test Results

How will the R value be determined?: By stabilometer
Input Type: Calculated
Tester's full name: Vincent Onoh
Date of test: 09/30/2013
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 99 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 93 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 74 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 58 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 45 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 34 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 24 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 17 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 12 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 10 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve: 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve: 87 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve: 80 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve: 62 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve: 48 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve: 36 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve: 25 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve: 18 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve: 13 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve: 11 %
R value:82
General comments (publicly viewable) (Max 250 characters):

Test was verified on 02/19/2015