Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
DEA: No Project
QA Service Level:
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: ---
Work Description: Special project identifier for material not associated with a project
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2019-08-16-18
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (559) 230-3109
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 08/16/2019
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/23/2019
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: One JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: Aggregate, Loose Mix, Asphalt, LAS, RAP
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Papich Paso Robles
RAP Source: Papich Paso Robles
Aggregate Size: 1/2
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile: Static
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 05/01/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests
|
1
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.418
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 05/01/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
no data
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.59 %
|
Mass Loss
|
no data
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data
|
Moisture Content
|
no data
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data
|
Test Temperature
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-15: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 09/17/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test: These are corrected, versus uncorrected to illustrate the difference.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
99.7 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
89.9 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve
|
no data
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
60.8 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
41.6 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
29.5 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
21.1 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
15.3 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
10.3 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
6.7 %
|