Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2021-03-12-14

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 214900 DEA: 034F8104 EFIS: 0314000291 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 03-GLE-32-L0.0/R0.3,0.1/0.9
Work Description: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS, CURB RAMPS, & DRIVEWAYS.
Location Description: GLENN COUNTY IN ORLAND AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FROM ROUTE 5 SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP TO ROUTE 32 TO NINTH STREET/TEHAMA STREET AND FROM FOURTH STREET TO WOODWARD AVENUE
Contractor Name: T AND S DVBE, INC.
Contractor Address: 4965 S. Barney Street, Anderson, CA 96007
Resident Engineer: Ryan Johnson Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2021-03-12-14
TL Number from the TL Form: C778174
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 741-4238
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 03/12/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 03/12/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: JMF21-003
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Knife River Construction - Orland Drum Plant

Material Information

RAP Source: KRC Orland
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 12/07/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003. KRC Personnel
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? no data
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.79 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 02/08/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.574
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 02/08/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003. Ben Dreher
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 92 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 63 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 43 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 32 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 8.2 %