Print Report | Back to Test Summary

Testing Report for 2021-02-24-23-3

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 215676 DEA: 020J6404 EFIS: 0219000145 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-36-R13.6/R14.2
Work Description: A13 at Route 36 Safety
Location Description: In Plumas County near Chester from 0.2 mile west of Bailey Creek Bridge to 0.3 mile east of County Road A-13.
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2021-02-24-23
TL Number from the TL Form: 824581
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - North Region Materials Lab
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Preliminary
Type of Material: Soil
Sample Taken Date: 02/24/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 02/24/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Structural Section Recomendation
A brief description of the sample: Soil
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: D78747
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: In Situ

Material Information

The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample:
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample:
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: 02-PLU-36-13.8, Shoulder Slope, 6 to 12-inch Depth
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled:

Test Information

DIME Test ID: 2021-02-24-23-1
Test Method: CTM 202-November 2011: Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates
Verified Date: 04/09/2021
Date Tested: 02/26/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - North Region Materials Lab
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Dr,MS-83
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Additional Comments When Verified :

Submitted Test Results

How will the R value be determined? By stabilometer
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 98 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 96 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 95 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 92 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 90 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 81 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 71 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 62 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 53 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 45 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 36 %
As Received Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 29 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 1/2 in. sieve 96 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing 3/8 in. sieve 94 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #4 sieve 83 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #8 sieve 73 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #16 sieve 64 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #30 sieve 55 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #50 sieve 46 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #100 sieve 37 %
As Used Gradation, Percent Passing #200 sieve 30 %
R value 73