Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 214135 DEA: 09213404 EFIS: 0900000030
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-INY-395-29.9/41.8
Work Description: ROADWAY EXCAVATION, PLACE HMA (TYPE A), AND ALTERNATIVE PIPE CULVERT.
Location Description: INYO COUNTY NEAR OLANCHA AND CARTAGO FROM 1.4 MILES SOUTH OF LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT BRIDGE TO 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF ASH CREEK BRIDGE
Contractor Name: FISHER SAND & GRAVEL CO.
Contractor Address: 1302 W DRIVERS WAY, TEPE, AZ. 85284
Resident Engineer: Kris Raber Structure Rep.: Sheila Reyes
DIME Sample ID: 2024-05-20-125
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 05/20/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 05/20/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 1 Bag of RAP
A brief description of the sample: 3/8" RAP
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: 0014
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Fisher Sand & Gravel
DIME Test ID: 2024-05-20-125-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 06/04/2024
Date Tested: 06/04/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: CF-R82 RAP
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-5.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-5.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-6.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-3.0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-2.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-2.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-2.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-2.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-2.1 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
99 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
88 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
80 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
61 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
52 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
42 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
32 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
22 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
14 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
8.6 %
|
