Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 993339 DEA: 024H9304 EFIS: 0219000027
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SHA-299-44.3/44.9
Work Description: INGOT CURVE IMPROVEMENT - CURVE IMROVEMENT
Location Description: IN SHASTA COUNTY NEAR INGOT FROM 2.7 MILES EAST OF SEAMANS GULCH ROAD TO 1.2 MILES WEST OF DU BOIS ROAD.
Contractor Name: Stimpel Wiebellhaus Inc.
Contractor Address: 1168 Industrial St., REDDING, CA 96002
Resident Engineer: Joel Gasik Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2023-07-11-96
TL Number from the TL Form: 853402
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 07/11/2023
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/11/2023
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: Combined RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79296B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis – Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA)
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-96-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 11/20/2023
Date Tested: 07/17/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=5.31
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3017.2 g
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4535.8 g
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1518.6 g
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.31 %
|
Mass Loss
|
83.7 g
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1434.9 g
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.00 %
|
Moisture Content
|
0.00 %
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.20 %
|
Test Temperature
|
1000 F
|
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-96-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 11/20/2023
Date Tested: 07/14/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.568
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests
|
1
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7335.7 grams
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1570.9 grams
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8294.9 grams
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.568
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2560.6 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-96-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 11/20/2023
Date Tested: 07/18/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.0 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1.0 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.5 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.6 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
97 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
86 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
71 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
50 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
37 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
27 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
19 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
14 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
10 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
7.2 %
|