Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 993299 DEA: 022J3904 EFIS: 0221000073
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SHA-44-45.5/51.6
Work Description: HMA OVERLAY, REPLACE AC SURFACING AND SHOULDER BACKING.
Location Description: SHASTA COUNTY NEAR VIOLA FROM 3.0 MILES EAST OF DEER FLAT ROAD TO 0.5 MILE EAST OF BRIDGE CREEK ROAD
Contractor Name: TULLIS INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2022-08-29-53
TL Number from the TL Form: 866065
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Department Acceptance
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 08/29/2022
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/29/2022
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 1 bag of Combined RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79143B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis – Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA)
DIME Test ID: 2022-08-29-53-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/09/2022
Date Tested: 08/31/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests
|
1
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7335.8 grams
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
2561.6 grams
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8895.7 grams
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.557
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
159.2 lb/ft^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-08-29-53-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/09/2022
Date Tested: 08/31/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Uncorrected
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
Test procedure used?
|
no data
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
no data
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
4.93 %
|
Mass Loss
|
no data
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
Moisture Content
|
no data
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data
|
Test Temperature
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-08-29-53-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/09/2022
Date Tested: 09/06/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Uncorrected
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
98 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
82.1 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
68.3 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve
|
54 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
47.5 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
34.7 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
25.4 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
18.8 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
13.8 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
10.2 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
7.8 %
|