Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2022-07-11-81

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 993345 DEA: 022J4004 EFIS: 0221000074 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-LAS-395-56.5/R61.1
Work Description: COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT AND PLACE HMA.
Location Description: LASSEN COUNTY NEAR JANESVILLE FROM 0.1 MILE NORTH OF SUNNYSIDE ROAD TO 0.1 MILE NORTH OF ROUTE 36
Contractor Name: Hat Creek Construction
Contractor Address: 24339 Highway 89 N, Burney, CA 96013
Resident Engineer: Daniel Gibbs Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2022-07-11-81
TL Number from the TL Form: 894728
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Aggregate
Sample Taken Date: 07/11/2022
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/14/2022
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: Combined Untreated 1/2-inch Virgin Aggregate
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79090F
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Hat Creek Construction and Materials – Ward Lake Plant (Litchfield, CA)

Material Information

Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site): 91-18-0008::Ward Lake Pit
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample:
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample:
The plant number:
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: Laboratory Batched from Untreated Sized Virgin Aggregate Stockpile Samples
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled:
Primary Aggregate Nominal Size: 1/2 inch
The concrete mix design number:
Lot number:
Sublot number:
Aggregate Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 7

Test Results

Test 1 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-1
Test Method: AASHTO T27-14: Standard Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Sieve Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 07/19/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: The mathematically combined aggregate gradation is finer on the 3/8-inch and coarser on the № 4 – 16 sieves than the design would suggest.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What type of gradation is being tested? HMA Gradation
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 84.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve 46.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 34.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 19.7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 12.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 7.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 3.2 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 2.33 %

Test 2 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-2
Test Method: AASHTO T335-09r13: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Percentage of Fracture in Coarse Aggregate (Percent of Crushed Particles)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/08/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Method 1 - Combined Fracture Determination
Aggregate Size and Fracture Type Coarse 1 and 2 Faced and Fine 1 Faced
Percentage of questionable, coarse, 2 faced particles tested 0 %
Percentage of questionable, coarse, 1 faced particles tested 0 %
Percentage of questionable, fine, 1 faced particles tested 0 %
Percentage of fractured, coarse, 2 faced particles tested 99 %
Percentage of fractured, coarse, 1 faced particles tested 100 %
Percentage of fractured, fine, 1 faced particles tested 98 %

Test 3 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-3
Test Method: AASHTO T96-02r10: Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine (Los Angeles Rattler)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/08/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Grading designation C
Mass of sample on No.12 sieve (after 500 revolutions) 4245 grams
Percent loss after 100 revolutions 3 %
Percent loss after 500 revolutions 15 %

Test 4 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-4
Test Method: AASHTO T210-15: Standard Method of Test for Aggregate Durability Index (Durability Index)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/09/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Which test procedure(s) is/are used? Procedure A and Procedure B
Was strict temperature control maintained? Yes
What type of water was used? Distilled
Durability Index (coarse) 85
Durability Index (fine) 90

Test 5 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-5
Test Method: AASHTO T176-08: Standard Method of Test for Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test (Sand Equivalent)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/08/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Sand Equivalent 93

Test 6 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-6
Test Method: AASHTO T304-11: Standard Method of Test for Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate (Fine of Crushed Particles)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/09/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What test method is performed? Method A
Bulk dry specific gravity 2.544
Average uncompacted voids 46.3 %

Test 7 of 7

DIME Test ID: 2022-07-11-81-7
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Verified Date: 08/15/2022
Date Tested: 08/08/2022
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Method B
Determination By Mass
Dimensional ratio used 5:1
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated 6 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated 94 %