Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2021-12-03-50

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 212779 DEA: 021H5804 EFIS: 0216000024 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-70-58.4/R78.4
Work Description:
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Mike Zdenek Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2021-12-03-50
TL Number from the TL Form: 876439
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Preliminary
Type of Material: Soil
Sample Taken Date: 12/03/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 12/06/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Existing soil at 02-PLU-70-69.0
A brief description of the sample: 1 bag of soil for use in geogrid embankment design
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: D78989
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: N/A

Material Information

The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample:
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample:
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: 02-PLU-70-69.01 from slope on North side of road, 0 to 0.83 ft. depth
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled: In situ
Test results on following page(s): 1

Test Results

Test 1 of 1

DIME Test ID: 2021-12-03-50-1
Test Method: CTM 203-February 2008: Mechanical Analysis of Soils
Verified Date: 01/21/2022
Date Tested: 12/28/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: These results may be erroneous. This sample may have included larger clods of conglomerated fines that were not broken down to their natural particle sizes per CT 201, §G, prior to performing additional tests. None of this sample remains for retesting.
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Cumulative percent passing the 3 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 93 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 79 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 72 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 56 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 45 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 37 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 31 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 25 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 19 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 15 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 1 Micron 2 %
Cumulative Percent Passing on 5 Microns 5 %