Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 215424 DEA: 024G4404 EFIS: 0214000013
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-3-38.0/38.6
Work Description: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Location Description: SISKIYOU COUNTY ABOUT 6 MILES NORTH OF FORT JONES FROM 0.3 MILE SOUTH TO 0.3 MILE NORTH OF LOWER MOFFETT CREEK ROAD
Contractor Name: Steelhead Constructors
Contractor Address: 2940 INNSBRUCK DRIVE, REDDING CA 96003
Resident Engineer: Nicole Mallory Structure Rep.: Andy O'Sullivan
DIME Sample ID: 2021-11-02-26
TL Number from the TL Form: 853086
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Department Acceptance
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 11/02/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 11/02/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: PSE
A brief description of the sample: 1/2 inch RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D78971
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis Inc Shasta Ranch Agg Anderson Ca
RAP Source: Tullis, Northstate Asphalt
Aggregate Size: 1/2 inch
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
DIME Test ID: 2021-11-02-26-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 11/19/2021
Date Tested: 11/17/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests
|
1
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7336.5 grams
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1625.7 grams
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8316.1 grams
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.516
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2021-11-02-26-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 11/19/2021
Date Tested: 11/06/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
Test procedure used?
|
no data
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
no data
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
6.02 %
|
Mass Loss
|
no data
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
Moisture Content
|
no data
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data
|
Test Temperature
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2021-11-02-26-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 11/19/2021
Date Tested: 11/08/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
94.1 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
84.5 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve
|
71.6 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
62.8 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
45.9 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
33.5 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
24.8 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
18 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
12.9 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
9.5 %
|