Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2021-07-19-34

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 215350 DEA: 081E0604 EFIS: 0813000140 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-SBD-18-97.0/99.5
Work Description: WIDEN ROADWAY WITH HMA, MINOR CONCRETE & MODIFY SIGNAL & LIGHTING.
Location Description: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IN VICTORVILLE FROM AMARGOSA ROAD TO COBALT ROAD
Contractor Name: SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
Contractor Address: 135 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD #400, BREA CA 92821
Resident Engineer: Larry Canuti Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2021-07-19-34
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Barstow Field Laboratory 1
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 252-9216
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 07/19/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/20/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 1Bag
A brief description of the sample: 3/4 HMA-SP Type A
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: sublot 2
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name: 60 tons out at 719 am
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Blue Diamond-Victorville

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number: 2
HMA Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 1

DIME Test ID: 2021-07-19-34-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/30/2021
Date Tested: 07/28/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Barstow Field Laboratory 1
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: kaushalkumar.talati@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 840-8328
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 0 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 0 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 56 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 45 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 33 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 13 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 3.7 %