Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 215073 DEA: 034H5604 EFIS: 0318000332
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 03-PLA-65-R12.9/R13.1
Work Description: CONSTRUCT SLOPE PAVING AND PLACE EROSION CONTROL.
Location Description: PLACER COUNTY IN LINCOLN AT THE SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH BRIDGE
Contractor Name: McCuen Construction, Inc.
Contractor Address: 3269 Swetzer Road, Loomis, CA,95690
Resident Engineer: Berhane Tesfagabar Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2021-03-02-32
TL Number from the TL Form: c764977
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 741-4238
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 03/02/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 03/02/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: JMF21-008
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Vulcan Materials Company - Roseville
RAP Source: Vulcan Materials Roseville, RAP Bin 1
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
DIME Test ID: 2021-03-02-32-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 04/12/2021
Date Tested: 01/04/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-008.
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
Test procedure used?
|
no data
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
no data
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
4.60 %
|
Mass Loss
|
no data
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data
|
Moisture Content
|
no data
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data
|
Test Temperature
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2021-03-02-32-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 04/12/2021
Date Tested: 03/02/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-008.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests
|
1
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7407 grams
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1795.4 grams
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8507.9 grams
|
Temperature of Water
|
76 °F
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.585
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2021-03-02-32-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 04/12/2021
Date Tested: 03/02/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-008.
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
99 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
89 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
63 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
45 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
35 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
27 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
19 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
13 %
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
9.0 %
|