Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2020-03-02-27

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 213411 DEA: 030H10U4 EFIS: 0317000246 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 03-SAC-5-9.7/24.9
Work Description:
Location Description: Construction on state highway in Sacramento County in and near Sacramento from 1.1 miles south of Elk Grove Boulevard to American River Viaduct
Contractor Name: NOR CAL PAVING TEICHERT/GRANITE
Contractor Address: 400 Sunrise Ave. Ste. #300, Roseville, CA 95661
Resident Engineer: Daniel Tecle Structure Rep.: Pha Tran

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2020-03-02-27
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 741-4238
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 03/02/2020
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 03/03/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: 3/4" HMA - A w/RAP (Long Life, RB)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: JMF20-002
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Granite Construction Company - Bradshaw

Material Information

RAP Source: GCCO Bradshaw Plant, Bin 1
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-03-02-27-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 01/06/2021
Date Tested: 03/25/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-002
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified: JMF20-002
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.69 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-03-02-27-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 01/06/2021
Date Tested: 03/25/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-002.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified: JMF20-002
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.585
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-03-02-27-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 01/06/2021
Date Tested: 03/25/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-002.
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified: JMF20-002
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 74 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 52 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 39 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 30 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 22 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 11.4 %