Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2020-06-08-37

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 213835 DEA: 051F7404 EFIS: 0514000049 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 05-MON-101-R28.0/R30.6
Work Description: PLACE CONTINUOUSLY REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT ON EXISTING ROADWAY.
Location Description: MONTEREY COUNTY NEAR SAN LUCAS FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF PARIS VALLEY ROAD OVERCROSSING TO RANCHO UNDERCROSSING
Contractor Name: PAPICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Contractor Address: 398 SUNRISE TERRACE, ARROYO GRANDE, CA 93425
Resident Engineer: Amy Norris Structure Rep.: Juan Moreno

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2020-06-08-37
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (559) 230-3109
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 06/08/2020
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/19/2020
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: One JMF Renewal
A brief description of the sample: Bag of RAP
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: SPM Templeton

Material Information

RAP Source: Templeton
Aggregate Size: Unknown
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-06-08-37-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/02/2020
Date Tested: 06/23/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test: Subtract 2.17 for equivalent ASTM D 2172 value.
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1528.1 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.33 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature 1000 F

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-06-08-37-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 07/02/2020
Date Tested: 01/17/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.455
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-06-08-37-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/02/2020
Date Tested: 06/24/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Does this test use 1/4 sieve? No
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 99.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 91.8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 62.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 45.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 34 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 26 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 18.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 12.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 7.3 %