Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2020-04-21-28

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 214253 DEA: 051J0404 EFIS: 0517000054 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 05-SLO,MON-46,101-49.5,R3.1/R5.2
Work Description: INSTALL ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS.
Location Description: SAN LUIS OBISPO AND MONTEREY COUNTIES ON ROUTE 46 AT SHANDON SAFETY ROADSIDE REST AREA AND ON ROUTE 101 AT CAMP ROBERTS SAFETY ROADSIDE REST AREAS
Contractor Name: Hoseley Corp
Contractor Address: 1485 Bayshore Boulevard, #193, San Francisco, CA 94 124
Resident Engineer: Amy Norris Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2020-04-21-28
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (559) 230-3109
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 04/21/2020
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 04/29/2020
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: One JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: Bag of RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: CalPortland Paso

Material Information

RAP Source: CalPortland Paso
Aggregate Size: Unknown
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 3

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/30/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test: binder correction -0.82 results in 5.61%
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2064.2 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.43 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/02/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.410
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/30/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: glenn.johnson@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3158
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 86 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve 0 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 55.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 39.7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 29.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 21.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 14.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 5.9 %