Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2024-07-01-71

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 215676 DEA: 020J6404 EFIS: 0219000145 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-36-R13.6/R14.2
Work Description: A13 AT ROUTE 36 SAFETY
Location Description: IN PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CHESTER FROM 0.2 MILE WEST OF BAILEY CREEK BRIDGE TO 0.3 MILE EAST OF COUNTY ROAD A-13.
Contractor Name: BALDWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. DBA KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
Contractor Address: 1764 SKYWAY, CHICO CA 95928
Resident Engineer: Daniel Gibbs Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2024-07-01-71
TL Number from the TL Form: 692867
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 07/01/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/01/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750k
A brief description of the sample: 2 bags of Lime treated 3/4-inch Agg.
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79630B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Knife River Construction

Material Information

RAP Source: Knife River Construction
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 4

Test Results

Test 1 of 4

DIME Test ID: 2024-07-01-71-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/16/2024
Date Tested: 07/15/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=6.58%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3062.6 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4684 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1621.4 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.57 %
Mass Loss 109.6 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1511.8 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data0 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.19 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 2 of 4

DIME Test ID: 2024-07-01-71-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 07/16/2024
Date Tested: 07/15/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.558
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? SI Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 7333 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 1599.4 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8307.1 grams
Temperature of Water 25 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.558
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 2550.6 kg/m^3

Test 3 of 4

DIME Test ID: 2024-07-01-71-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive, MS-83,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 225-3194
This test has been superseded on 07/16/2024. The corrected test ID is: 2024-07-01-71-4
Reason: retested

Test 4 of 4

DIME Test ID: 2024-07-01-71-4
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/16/2024
Date Tested: 07/16/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
The test was superseded from test ID: 2024-07-01-71-3
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -0.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) 0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 88 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 63 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 46 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 34 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 27 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 20 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 14 %