Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2023-08-28-97

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 995104 DEA: 023J7504 EFIS: 0222000080 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-LAS-139-32/38
Work Description: Grasshopper CIR
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2023-08-28-97
TL Number from the TL Form: 858045
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 08/28/2023
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/28/2023
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 1 bag of Fine RAP (3/8-inch)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79335B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Hat Creek Construction and Materials - Ward Lake Plant (Litchfield, CA)

Material Information

RAP Source: Hat Creek Construction and Materials, Ward Lake Plant, Litchfield, CA
Aggregate Size: 3/8-inch
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2023-08-28-97-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 03/19/2024
Date Tested: 08/30/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=6.92%, Pbr≈5.44%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3035.2 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4618.8 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1583.6 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.92 %
Mass Loss 109.6 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1474.0 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.00 %
Moisture Content 0.00 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.00 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2023-08-28-97-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 03/19/2024
Date Tested: 08/30/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: P¾″=100.%, P½″=100.%, P⅜″=99%, P№4=76%, P№8=57%, P№30=33%, P№200=11.3%
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) 0.0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) 0.0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) 1.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) 2.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) 3.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) 2.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) 1.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) 0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) 0.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 57 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 44 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 33 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 11.3 %

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2023-08-28-97-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 03/19/2024
Date Tested: 08/30/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.478, Gser≈2.692
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? SI Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 7335.1 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 1761.3 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8385.6 grams
Temperature of Water 75 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.478
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 2470.8 kg/m^3