Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2023-10-30-99

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 212246 DEA: 053307A4 EFIS: 0514000027 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 05-SLO-46-49.7/54.6
Work Description: Cholame Segment
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Atkinson Construction
Contractor Address: 18201 Von Karman - Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92612
Resident Engineer: Andrew Borrelli Structure Rep.: Dave Lewis

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2023-10-30-99
TL Number from the TL Form: C979514
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT HQ - Sacramento Hot Mix Asphalt Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (916) 227-7302
Type of Sample: Dispute Resolution
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 10/30/2023
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 01/11/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 1 Bags RAP
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: 024-005
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: SPM AVENAL

Material Information

RAP Source: SPM Avenal
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile: Static
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test 1 of 2

DIME Test ID: 2023-10-30-99-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 01/25/2024
Date Tested: 01/18/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT HQ - Sacramento Hot Mix Asphalt Laboratory
Organization Address: 5900 Folsom Boulevard,
Organization City: Sacramento
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95819
Organization Email: guadalupe.magana@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 713-6823
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 2
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? SI Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 7355.5 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 1602.6 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8309.3 grams
Mass of container filled with water 7355.5
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 2 1619.8 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 2 8322.5 grams
Temperature of Water 77 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.47
Specific Gravity for Sample 2 2.481
Average Specific Gravity 2.476
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 2468.8 kg/m^3

Test 2 of 2

DIME Test ID: 2023-10-30-99-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 01/25/2024
Date Tested: 01/25/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT HQ - Sacramento Hot Mix Asphalt Laboratory
Organization Address: 5900 Folsom Boulevard,
Organization City: Sacramento
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95819
Organization Email: guadalupe.magana@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 713-6823
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -1.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 85 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 57 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 40 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 27 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 21 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 15 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 7.8 %