Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 994785 DEA: 023H32U4 EFIS: 0221000164
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-I5-2.5/R15.9
Work Description: Roadway rehabilitation and bridge improvements along I5 in Mount Shasta
Location Description: SIS I5 2.5/R15.9
Contractor Name: Gordon Stout - Walsh/Myers
Contractor Address: 1390 Willow Pass Rd Suite 950, Concord, CA 94520
Resident Engineer: Austin Henry Structure Rep.: Mike Sears
DIME Sample ID: 2023-07-11-73
TL Number from the TL Form: 036763
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 07/11/2023
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/11/2023
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: Combined RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79292B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis – Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA)
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-73-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 11/07/2023
Date Tested: 07/17/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=5.39
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3109 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4693.8 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1584.8 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.39 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
88.5 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1496.3 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.19 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-73-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 11/07/2023
Date Tested: 07/14/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.567
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7335.7 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1577.9 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8298.9 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
76 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.567
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2559.6 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2023-07-11-73-4
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 11/13/2023
Date Tested: 07/18/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
90 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
76 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
53 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
38 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
27 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
20 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
15 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
10 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
7.7 %
|
