Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2023-09-27-48

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 995105 DEA: 023J8104 EFIS: 0222000086 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-3-0.408/7.1
Work Description: Scott Mountain Overlay
Location Description:
Contractor Name: TULLIS INC
Contractor Address: P O BOX 493416, REDDING CA 96049
Resident Engineer: Nicholas Riddle Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2023-09-27-48
TL Number from the TL Form: 824454
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Aggregate
Sample Taken Date: 09/27/2023
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/28/2023
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: Untreated 3/8-inch Virgin Aggregate
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79361F
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis - Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA)

Material Information

Source Identification (SMARA, name of Pit or Job Site): 91-45-0057::Shasta Ranch Aggregates (Anderson, CA)
The fabricator's/manufacturer's product name for the sample:
The fabricator/manufacturer designation for the sample:
The plant number:
A detailed description of where the material sample was collected: Combined in Laboratory from Untreated Sized Virgin Aggregate Stockpile Samples
Where the material sample would have been placed if not sampled:
Primary Aggregate Nominal Size: 3/8 inch
The concrete mix design number:
Lot number:
Sublot number:
Aggregate Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 8

Test Results

Test 1 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-1
Test Method: AASHTO T27-14: Standard Method of Test for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Sieve Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/02/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What type of gradation is being tested? Combined Gradation
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 57 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 35 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 24 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 6.9 %

Test 2 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-3
Test Method: AASHTO T335-09r13: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Percentage of Fracture in Coarse Aggregate (Percent of Crushed Particles)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/11/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: PC(C1)=100.%, PC(C2)=100.%, PC(F1)=100.%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Method 2 - Individual Fracture Determination
Aggregate Size and Fracture Type Coarse 1 and 2 Faced and Fine 1 Faced
Percentage of questionable, 1 ½ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, 1 ½ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, 1 inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, 1 inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ¾ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ¾ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ½ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ½ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ⅜ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ⅜ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ¼ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, ¼ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, No. 4, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, No. 4, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of questionable, No. 8, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, 1 ½ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, 1 ½ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, 1 inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, 1 inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ¾ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ¾ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ½ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ½ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ⅜ inch, 2 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ⅜ inch, 1 faced particles tested no data0 %
Percentage of fractured, ¼ inch, 2 faced particles tested 100 %
Percentage of fractured, ¼ inch, 1 faced particles tested 100 %
Percentage of fractured, No. 4, 2 faced particles tested 100 %
Percentage of fractured, No. 4, 1 faced particles tested 100 %
Percentage of fractured, No. 8, 1 faced particles tested 100 %
Weighted average percentage of fractured, coarse, 2 faced particles 100 %
Weighted average percentage of fractured, coarse, 1 faced particles 100 %
Percentage of fractured, fine, 1 faced particles tested 100 %

Test 3 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-4
Test Method: AASHTO T96-02r10: Standard Method of Test for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine (Los Angeles Rattler)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: L100=3%, L500=16%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Grading designation C
Mass of sample on No.12 sieve (after 500 revolutions) 4189 grams
Percent loss after 100 revolutions 3 %
Percent loss after 500 revolutions 16 %

Test 4 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-5
Test Method: AASHTO T176-08: Standard Method of Test for Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test (Sand Equivalent)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: SE=66
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Sand Equivalent 66

Test 5 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-6
Test Method: AASHTO T210-15: Standard Method of Test for Aggregate Durability Index (Durability Index)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Dc=82, Df=80
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Which test procedure(s) is/are used? Procedure A and Procedure B
Was strict temperature control maintained? Yes
What type of water was used? Distilled
Durability Index (coarse) 82
Durability Index (fine) 80

Test 6 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-7
Test Method: AASHTO T304-11: Standard Method of Test for Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate (Fine of Crushed Particles)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Us=45.8
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What test method is performed? Method A
Bulk dry specific gravity 2.527
Average uncompacted voids 45.8 %

Test 7 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-8
Test Method: CTM 204-June 2010: Method of Test for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils (Plasticity Index)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: PI=NP
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Plastic Index(PI) NP
Liquid Limit (LL) Undetermined %
Plastic Limit (PL) Undetermined %

Test 8 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2023-09-27-48-9
Test Method: ASTM D4791-10: Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate (Withdrawn 2019) (Flat and Elongated Particles)
Verified Date: 10/16/2023
Date Tested: 10/06/2023
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: F&E(5:1)=2%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Method B
Determination By Mass
Dimensional ratio used 5:1
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were flat and elongated 2 %
Weighted percentage of particles (by mass) that were not flat and elongated 98 %