Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 66667 DEA: JMFPP EFIS: 0019000043
QA Service Level:
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 59---
Work Description: Special project for submitting Sample information for JMF Prequalification Program.
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2022-02-01-36
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Sample Organization Contact: (714) 235-7028
Type of Sample: Aggregate Prequalification Program
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 02/01/2022
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 02/01/2022
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 1 Bag combined RAP
A brief description of the sample: Combined RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: RJ Noble Co Orange
DIME Test ID: 2022-02-01-36-1
Test Method: AASHTO T164-14: Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 02/18/2022
Date Tested: 02/17/2022
Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Organization Address: 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. BOX 620
Organization City: Orange
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92865
Organization Email: qualitycontrol@rjnoblecompany.com
Organization Phone: (714) 235-7028
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5 %
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-02-01-36-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 02/18/2022
Date Tested: 02/17/2022
Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Organization Address: 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. BOX 620
Organization City: Orange
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92865
Organization Email: qualitycontrol@rjnoblecompany.com
Organization Phone: (714) 235-7028
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
95.6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
87.8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
63.7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
45.6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
34.8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
26 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
18.1 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
9.4 %
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-02-01-36-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 02/18/2022
Date Tested: 02/17/2022
Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Organization Address: 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. BOX 620
Organization City: Orange
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92865
Organization Email: qualitycontrol@rjnoblecompany.com
Organization Phone: (714) 235-7028
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
3
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Water
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.484
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 2
|
2.486
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 3
|
2.482
|
|
Average Specific Gravity
|
2.484
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-02-01-36-4
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 02/18/2022
Date Tested: 02/17/2022
Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Organization Address: 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. BOX 620
Organization City: Orange
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92865
Organization Email: qualitycontrol@rjnoblecompany.com
Organization Phone: (714) 235-7028
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Fahrenheit
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
no data
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
no data
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
6.28 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
no data
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data
|
|
Test Temperature
|
no data
|
DIME Test ID: 2022-02-01-36-5
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 02/18/2022
Date Tested: 02/17/2022
Submitted By Organization: RJ Noble Company
Organization Address: 15505 East Lincoln Avenue, P.O. BOX 620
Organization City: Orange
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92865
Organization Email: qualitycontrol@rjnoblecompany.com
Organization Phone: (714) 235-7028
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
96.4 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
88.9 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
67.3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
50.7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
38.4 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
28.7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
20.4 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
14.5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
10.1 %
|
