Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2021-03-12-14

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 214900 DEA: 034F8104 EFIS: 0314000291 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 03-GLE-32-L0.0/R0.3,0.1/0.9
Work Description: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS, CURB RAMPS, & DRIVEWAYS.
Location Description: GLENN COUNTY IN ORLAND AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS FROM ROUTE 5 SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP TO ROUTE 32 TO NINTH STREET/TEHAMA STREET AND FROM FOURTH STREET TO WOODWARD AVENUE
Contractor Name: T AND S DVBE, INC.
Contractor Address: 4965 S. Barney Street, Anderson, CA 96007
Resident Engineer: Ryan Johnson Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2021-03-12-14
TL Number from the TL Form: C778174
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 741-4238
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 03/12/2021
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 03/12/2021
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: JMF21-003
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Knife River Construction - Orland Drum Plant

Material Information

RAP Source: KRC Orland
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 3

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 12/07/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003. KRC Personnel
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? no data
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.79 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 02/08/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.574
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2021-03-12-14-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 04/01/2021
Date Tested: 02/08/2021
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF21-003. Ben Dreher
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 92 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 63 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 43 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 32 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 8.2 %