Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2020-04-14-51

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 214492 DEA: 033F5404 EFIS: 0313000136 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 03-SAC-99,160-4.5/5.7,R44.5
Work Description: FURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SLAB & PLACE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE.
Location Description: SACRAMENTO COUNTY NEAR GALT ON ROUTE 99 FROM NORTH OF MINGO ROAD TO SOUTH OF ARNO ROAD OVERCROSSING AND IN SACRAMENTO ON ROUTE 160 AT AMERICAN RIVER BRIDGE
Contractor Name: BROSAMER & WALL, INC.
Contractor Address: 5000 Marsh Drive, Suite 300, Conord, CA 94520
Resident Engineer: Mohssen Ghassemi Structure Rep.: Chris Quon

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2020-04-14-51
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 741-4238
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 04/14/2020
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 04/15/2020
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: 1/2 inch HMA - A (SP)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: JMF20-014
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Teichert Perkins Batch Plant

Material Information

RAP Source: Perkins
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source: Perkins
RAP Stockpile: Continuous
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 3

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-14-51-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 11/25/2020
Date Tested: 04/21/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-014
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 5.1 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-14-51-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 11/25/2020
Date Tested: 04/20/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-014
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.565
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-14-51-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 11/25/2020
Date Tested: 04/21/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D03 - Olivehurst Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 5330 Arboga Road,
Organization City: Olivehurst
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95961
Organization Email: jeff.herbert@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 741-4238
General Comments for this Test: JMF20-014
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 98 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 78 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 59 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 45 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 35 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 25 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 12.1 %