Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2020-04-21-28

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 214253 DEA: 051J0404 EFIS: 0517000054 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 05-SLO,MON-46,101-49.5,R3.1/R5.2
Work Description: INSTALL ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS.
Location Description: SAN LUIS OBISPO AND MONTEREY COUNTIES ON ROUTE 46 AT SHANDON SAFETY ROADSIDE REST AREA AND ON ROUTE 101 AT CAMP ROBERTS SAFETY ROADSIDE REST AREAS
Contractor Name: Hoseley Corp
Contractor Address: 1485 Bayshore Boulevard, #193, San Francisco, CA 94 124
Resident Engineer: Amy Norris Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2020-04-21-28
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 8057463562
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 04/21/2020
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 04/29/2020
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: One JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: Bag of RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: CalPortland Paso

Material Information

RAP Source: CalPortland Paso
Aggregate Size: Unknown
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 3

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/30/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test: binder correction -0.82 results in 5.61%
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2064.2 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.43 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/02/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.41
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2020-04-21-28-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 05/15/2020
Date Tested: 04/30/2020
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 97.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 86 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve no data0 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 55.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 39.7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 29.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 21.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 14.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 5.9 %