Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2019-08-16-18

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

DEA: No Project QA Service Level:
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: ---
Work Description: Special project identifier for material not associated with a project
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2019-08-16-18
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 8057463562
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 08/16/2019
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/23/2019
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: One JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: Aggregate, Loose Mix, Asphalt, LAS, RAP
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Papich Paso Robles

Material Information

RAP Source: Papich Paso Robles
Aggregate Size: 1/2
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile: Static
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
Test results on following page(s): 3

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 05/01/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.418
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 05/01/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 5.59 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2019-08-16-18-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-15: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/26/2019
Date Tested: 09/17/2019
Submitted By Organization: CT D05 - San Luis Obispo District Laboratory
Organization Address: 50 Higuera Street,
Organization City: San Luis Obispo
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93401
Organization Email: daniel.gingras@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (805) 549-3141
General Comments for this Test: These are corrected, versus uncorrected to illustrate the difference.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 99.7 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 89.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve no data
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 60.8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 41.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 29.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 21.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 15.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 10.3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 6.7 %