Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2018-06-04-35

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 212741 DEA: 020E1804 EFIS: 0200000022 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-89-29.8/30.2
Work Description: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
Location Description: PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CANYON DAM FROM 0.2 MILE SOUTH TO 0.3 MILE NORTH OF LAKE ALMANOR SPILLWAY
Contractor Name: Q&D CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contractor Address: P.O Box 10865, Reno, NV 89510
Resident Engineer: Ryan Johnson Structure Rep.: Matt Crete

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2018-06-04-35
TL Number from the TL Form: 894777
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Verification
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 06/04/2018
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/05/2018
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: JMF Verification
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D77438
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Sierra Cascade Aggregate and Asphalt Products

Material Information

RAP Source: Dig It Construction
Aggregate Size: 3/8-inch
Aggregate Source: Unknown
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons): Unknown
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2018-06-04-35-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 01/22/2019
Date Tested: 06/08/2018
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.476
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2018-06-04-35-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 01/22/2019
Date Tested: 06/07/2018
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Fahrenheit
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition no data
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.88 %
Mass Loss no data
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data
Moisture Content no data
Temperature Compensation Factor no data
Test Temperature no data

Test

DIME Test ID: 2018-06-04-35-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-15: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 01/22/2019
Date Tested: 06/08/2018
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance:
Additional Comments When Verified:
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve no data
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 99.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 93.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/4 in. sieve 82.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 75 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 56.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 42.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 31.8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 22.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 15.7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 11.51 %