Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1002614 DEA: 081K6304 EFIS: 0819000083
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-SBD-18-T6.0/9.1
Work Description: CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IN SAN BERNARDINO FROM 29TH STREET TO 0.2 MILE SOUTH OF OLD WATERMAN CANYON ROAD.
Location Description: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ON WATERMAN AVE
Contractor Name: Maneri Traffic Control
Contractor Address: 4949 SECOND STREET, FALLBROOK, CA 92028
Resident Engineer: Shaun Loza Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-10-08-50
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9098293350
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 10/08/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 10/09/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 328.07 Tons @ 09:19am
A brief description of the sample: HMA-A SP 3/4"
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: 0593A-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Matich Corporation — Rialto Drum Plant
DIME Test ID: 2026-10-08-50-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/19/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: james.holloway@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-8846
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-2.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
1.2 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
97 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
72 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
60 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
46 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
35 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
26 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
21 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
6.1 %
|