Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-10-08-14

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002406 DEA: 09428804 EFIS: 0925000089 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-INY-395-
Work Description: RTE 395 LITTLE LAKE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION (PM R8.4/R11.8): HMA (TYPE A) OVERLAY & DIGOUTS, HMA DIKE (TYPE E), SHOULDER BACKING, RUMBLE STRIP, FOG SEAL, COLD PLANE, THERMO STRIPING
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Bowman Asphalt Inc.
Contractor Address: 3351 Fairhaven Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93308
Resident Engineer: Hin Hartanto Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-10-08-14
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 10/08/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 10/07/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 3/8" HMA-A-SP PG64-28M
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: HMA-2
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Bowman Asphalt, Ridgecrest

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/8 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: L261845
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%): 0
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-10-08-14-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 10/13/2026
Date Tested: 10/12/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-02
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4257.1 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 5886.2 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.88 %
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1629.1 g
Mass Loss 84.5 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1544.6 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.31 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor no data0 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-10-08-14-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/13/2026
Date Tested: 10/13/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-02 PP Gradation
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -2.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -2.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -4.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -4.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -3.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -2.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -1.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 96 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 54 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 31 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 20 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 14 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 4.1 %