Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-10-06-15

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002406 DEA: 09428804 EFIS: 0925000089 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-INY-395-
Work Description: RTE 395 LITTLE LAKE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION (PM R8.4/R11.8): HMA (TYPE A) OVERLAY & DIGOUTS, HMA DIKE (TYPE E), SHOULDER BACKING, RUMBLE STRIP, FOG SEAL, COLD PLANE, THERMO STRIPING
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Bowman Asphalt Inc.
Contractor Address: 3351 Fairhaven Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93308
Resident Engineer: Hin Hartanto Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-10-06-15
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 10/06/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 10/07/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 3/8" HMA-A-SP PG64-28M
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: HMA-1
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Bowman Asphalt, Ridgecrest

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/8 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-10-06-15-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 10/09/2026
Date Tested: 10/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-01 Oil Content Fails. Spec; 5.20-6.00
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4284.2 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 5887.4 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.82 %
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1603.2 g
Mass Loss 82.3 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1520.9 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.31 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor no data0 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-10-06-15-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/09/2026
Date Tested: 10/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-01 PP Gradation
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -1.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -2.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -2.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -2.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -1.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 98 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 53 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 34 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 10 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 6 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 3.4 %