Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-09-17-82

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 66667 DEA: JMFPP EFIS: 0019000043 QA Service Level:
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 59---
Work Description: Special project for submitting Sample information for JMF Prequalification Program.
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-09-17-82
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (858) 518-8709
Type of Sample: JMF Verification
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 09/17/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/11/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 12 boxes
A brief description of the sample: 3/4" RHMA-G
From where was the sample collected: Supplier
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Vulcan Otay

Material Information

HMA Type: RHMA-G
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: 226110T Otay SJR
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-17-82-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Organization Address: 4050 Taylor Street,
Organization City: San Diego
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92110
Organization Email: benjamin.haney@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (858) 688-1595
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4038.1 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6103.4 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 7.95 %
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2065.3 g
Mass Loss 180.4 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1884.9 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.78 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor no data0 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-17-82-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-25: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Organization Address: 4050 Taylor Street,
Organization City: San Diego
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92110
Organization Email: benjamin.haney@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (858) 688-1595
General Comments for this Test: Does Not Comply Target 2.399 - Tested 2.419
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of Samples 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 1 7475.6 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 2538.7 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8964.6 grams
Temperature of Water 77 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.419
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 150.6 lb/ft^3

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-17-82-4
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/07/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Organization Address: 4050 Taylor Street,
Organization City: San Diego
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92110
Organization Email: benjamin.haney@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (858) 688-1595
General Comments for this Test: Complies Low Gmb to High Gmb within the 0.024 spec . Tested Low-2.335 Gmb and High 2.338 Gmb
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Bulk Specific Gravity 2.335
Bulk Specific Gravity 2 2.338
Bulk Specific Gravity 3 2.337
Average Bulk Specific Gravity 2.337

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-17-82-5
Test Method: AASHTO T269-14: Standard Method of Test for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Asphalt Mixtures (Air Void)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Organization Address: 4050 Taylor Street,
Organization City: San Diego
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92110
Organization Email: benjamin.haney@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (858) 688-1595
General Comments for this Test: Complies Target 4.0% (+/- 1.5% ) Tested an Avg of 3.4%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Percent Air Voids 3.5 %
Percent Air Voids 2 3.3 %
Percent Air Voids 3 3.4 %
Average Percent Air Voids 3.4 %

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-17-82-7
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/20/2026
Date Tested: 10/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D11 - District 11 Materials Laboratory
Organization Address: 4050 Taylor Street,
Organization City: San Diego
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92110
Organization Email: benjamin.haney@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (858) 688-1595
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) 0.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) 0.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) 0.2 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 77 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 41 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 26 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 4 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 3.4 %