Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-09-18-23

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002406 DEA: 09428804 EFIS: 0925000089 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-INY-395-
Work Description: RTE 395 LITTLE LAKE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION (PM R8.4/R11.8): HMA (TYPE A) OVERLAY & DIGOUTS, HMA DIKE (TYPE E), SHOULDER BACKING, RUMBLE STRIP, FOG SEAL, COLD PLANE, THERMO STRIPING
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Bowman Asphalt Inc.
Contractor Address: 3351 Fairhaven Dr., Bakersfield, CA 93308
Resident Engineer: Hin Hartanto Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-09-18-23
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 09/18/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/18/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 8 Boxes
A brief description of the sample: 3/4 HMA type A
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Bowman Asphalt, Bakersfield

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: L261606
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 5

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-18-23-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/22/2026
Date Tested: 09/21/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: PSU-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4252.1 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6411.7 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2159.6 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.94 %
Mass Loss 125.3 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 2034.3 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.86 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor no data0 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-18-23-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-22: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/22/2026
Date Tested: 09/21/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: PSU-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of Samples 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 1 7306.4 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 2038.3 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8520.5 grams
Temperature of Water 77 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.473
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 153.9 lb/ft^3

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-18-23-3
Test Method: AASHTO T269-14: Standard Method of Test for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Asphalt Mixtures (Air Void)
Verified Date: 09/22/2026
Date Tested: 09/21/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: PSU-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Percent Air Voids 3.1 %
Percent Air Voids 2 3.2 %
Percent Air Voids 3 3.2 %
Average Percent Air Voids 3.2 %

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-18-23-4
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/22/2026
Date Tested: 09/21/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: PSU-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Bulk Specific Gravity 2.397
Bulk Specific Gravity 2 2.393
Bulk Specific Gravity 3 2.395
Average Bulk Specific Gravity 2.395

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-09-18-23-5
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/22/2026
Date Tested: 09/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: PSU-1 PP Gradation
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) -0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -2.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -5.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -8.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -8.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -3.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -3.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -2 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 97 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 79 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 51 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 33 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 24 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 18 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 4.3 %