Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1001308 DEA: 081L1804 EFIS: 0819000162
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-RIV-91-13.5/16.8
Work Description: JPCP (RSC), INDIVIDUAL SLAB REPLACEMENT (RSC) & RUBBERIZED HMA.
Location Description: RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN RIVERSIDE FROM 0.6 MILE WEST OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD OVERCROSSING TO 0.2 MILE EAST OF MADISON STREET UNDERCROSSING.
Contractor Name: GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Michael St Jacques Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-09-03-36
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9098293350
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 09/03/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/04/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 113.10 Tons @ 11:13pm
A brief description of the sample: RWMA-G SP 3/4"
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: 0558G-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Vulcan Materials Company — Corona Drum Plant
DIME Test ID: 2026-09-03-36-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/16/2026
Date Tested: 09/16/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: james.holloway@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-8846
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
1.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
0.6 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
0.3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
95 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
83 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
66 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
34 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
23 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
18 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
12 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
4.6 %
|