Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-08-24-72

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002597 DEA: 021K0404 EFIS: 0224000045 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SHA-273-7/11
Work Description: Happy Valley BWC
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Edward Worden Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-24-72
TL Number from the TL Form: 875942
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 08/24/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/25/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 2 Bags RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80374B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: JF SHEA CLEAR CREEK

Material Information

RAP Source: JF Shea
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-24-72-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/14/2026
Date Tested: 08/28/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.508, Gser≈2.705
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? SI Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 7330.2 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 2572.3 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8877 grams
Temperature of Water 76 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.508
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 2500.7 kg/m^3

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-24-72-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/14/2026
Date Tested: 09/02/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=6.16%, Pbr≈4.90%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3036.6 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4696.4 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1659.8 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 6.16 %
Mass Loss 105.2 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1554.6 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data0 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.18 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-24-72-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/14/2026
Date Tested: 09/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 77 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 58 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 43 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 31 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 11.9 %