Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1002458 DEA: 09428604 EFIS: 0925000087
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-UNKNOWN--unknown
Work Description:
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Daniel Enriquez Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-09-02-56
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 09/02/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/08/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 8 Boxes HMA PSU
A brief description of the sample: 3/4” PG 64-28M
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: HMA-1
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Griffith Edmonston-Lebec
DIME Test ID: 2026-09-02-56-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/11/2026
Date Tested: 09/09/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
4283.2 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
6402.6 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
4.66 %
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2119.4 g
|
|
Mass Loss
|
115.3 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
2004.1 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.78 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
no data0 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-09-02-56-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-25: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/11/2026
Date Tested: 09/10/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of Samples
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water 1
|
7306.4 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
2131.6 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8612.7 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
76.9 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.583
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
160.8 lb/ft^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-09-02-56-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/11/2026
Date Tested: 09/10/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: HMA-1 PP Gradation
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
88 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
78 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
53 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
35 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
24 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
16 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
11 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
4.3 %
|