Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 995520 DEA: 041Y7004 EFIS: 0423000016
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 04-CC,SOL-80-13.8/14.1,0.0/0.4
Work Description: AL ZAMPA BRIDGE DECK REHABILITATION REPLACE TOP COURSE
Location Description: CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO COUNTIES AT CROCKETT AND IN VALLEJO FROM UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OVERHEAD TO 0.8 MILE SOUTH OF ROUTE 80/29 SEPARATION
Contractor Name: O.C. JONES & SONS, INC.
Contractor Address: 1520 fourth Street, Berkley, CA, 94710
Resident Engineer: Ferdinand Ciceron Structure Rep.: John Parecadan
DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-22-22
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (510) 385-7413
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 08/22/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/22/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 250 tons
A brief description of the sample: #3/8 HMA-A 16% RAP
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Martin Marrieta
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-22-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
2865.6 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4100.9 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1235.3 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.6 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
83.1 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1152.2 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.89 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.24 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
482 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-22-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-25: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of Samples
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water 1
|
7381.9 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1550 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8320.5 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.535
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2528 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-22-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
93 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
56 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
36 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
24 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
17 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
12 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
6.5 %
|