Sample Record for 2026-08-22-19
Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project Information
Project ID: 995520 DEA: 041Y7004 EFIS: 0423000016
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 04-CC,SOL-80-13.8/14.1,0.0/0.4
Work Description: AL ZAMPA BRIDGE DECK REHABILITATION REPLACE TOP COURSE
Location Description: CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO COUNTIES AT CROCKETT AND IN VALLEJO FROM UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD OVERHEAD TO 0.8 MILE SOUTH OF ROUTE 80/29 SEPARATION
Contractor Name: O.C. JONES & SONS, INC.
Contractor Address: 1520 fourth Street, Berkley, CA, 94710
Resident Engineer: Ferdinand Ciceron Structure Rep.: John Parecadan
Sample Information
DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-22-19
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (510) 385-7413
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 08/22/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/22/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 80 tons
A brief description of the sample: #3/8 HMA-A 16% RAP
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Martin Marrieta
Material Information
HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/8 inch
Lot number: 1
Sublot number: 1
HMA Mix Number: 75S25326L1
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier: San Juaquin
RAP content (%): 16
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test Results
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: Ignacio.Arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
This test has been superseded on 08/31/2026. The corrected test ID is: 2026-08-22-19-2
Reason: retested
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 08/31/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
The test was superseded from test ID: 2026-08-22-19-1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
2865.6 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4132.1 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1266.5 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.2 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
84.2 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1182.3 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
1.21 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.24 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-3
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
2861 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4126 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.2 %
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1265 g
|
|
Mass Loss
|
80.8 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1184.2 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.95 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.24 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
482 C
|
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-4
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
2849.5 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4114.8 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.2 %
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1265.3 g
|
|
Mass Loss
|
79.3 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1186 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.83 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.24 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
482 C
|
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-5
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
97 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
79 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
60 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
45 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
34 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
24 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
15 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
10 %
|
Test
DIME Test ID: 2026-08-22-19-6
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/01/2026
Date Tested: 08/22/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Blvd.,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94804
Organization Email: ignacio.arechiga@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7413
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.9 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.2 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
97 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
75 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
56 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
42 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
31 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
23 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
14 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
10 %
|
