Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-08-14-68

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002572 DEA: 061H9704 EFIS: 0625000105 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 06-MAD-152-R0.0/15.5
Work Description: MADERA COUNTY SLAB REPLACEMENT WITH DIGOUTS ON SR 59, 152. Cold plane AC, remove concrete pavement and place with HMA and RHMA.
Location Description: CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY IN MADERA COUNTY NEAR CHOWCHILLA FROM ROUTE 59/152 SEPARATION TO 0.1 MILE WEST OF ROUTE 99/152 SEPARATION.
Contractor Name: Granite Construction Company (Jorge Velazquez)
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Alaa Ghoneim Structure Rep.: None None

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-14-68
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D06 - Millbrook Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (559) 341-3953
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 08/14/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/14/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 0-750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 3/4" HMA Type A 12% RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Santa Fe Aggregate Winton

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number: 1
Sublot number: 4
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 5.1
Virgin binder PG: PG 70-10
Design binder PG: PG 70-10
Binder Supplier: SJR
RAP content (%): 12
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-14-68-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 08/31/2026
Date Tested: 08/14/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D06 - Millbrook Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 1352 W. Olive Ave,
Organization City: Fresno
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93728
Organization Email: tomas.silva@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (559) 341-3953
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 2925.6 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 5083 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2157.4 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 5.06 %
Mass Loss 120.7 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 2036.7 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.4 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.13 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-14-68-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/31/2026
Date Tested: 08/17/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D06 - Millbrook Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 1352 W. Olive Ave,
Organization City: Fresno
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93728
Organization Email: tomas.silva@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (559) 341-3953
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -2.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -2.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -1.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -1.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) 1.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -1.1 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 91 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 78 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 49 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 31 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 20 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 10 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 10 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 4.9 %