Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1000513 DEA: 020J8504 EFIS: 0219000168
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-89-21/R34.622
Work Description: MCCLOUD CAPM - PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Location Description: IN SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR MCCLOUD FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF MUD CREEK BRIDGE TO ROUTE 5
Contractor Name: TULLIS, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Austin Henry Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-07-27-95
TL Number from the TL Form: 846267
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 07/27/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/29/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 2 Bags RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80315B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis Inc. - Northstate Asphalt (Redding CA)
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-27-95-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 08/18/2026
Date Tested: 07/31/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.569,
Gser≈2.765
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7331.1 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1562.3 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8285.2 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.569
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2561.5 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-27-95-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 08/18/2026
Date Tested: 08/03/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=5.48%, Pbr≈4.61%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3045.9 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4676.4 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1630.5 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.48 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
92.3 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1538.2 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.18 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-27-95-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/18/2026
Date Tested: 08/04/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.9 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
89 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
75 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
52 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
38 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
28 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
20 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
15 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
11 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
8.5 %
|