Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-06-15-100

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1001960 DEA: 081J65U4 EFIS: 0824000091 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-RIV-10-0.0/R8.2
Work Description: HMA, RHMA, JPCP, JPCP(RSC), and individual slab replacement (RSC).
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Flatiron Dragados
Contractor Address: 12121 scripps Summit Drive, suite 400, Sandeigo, CA 92131
Resident Engineer: Khoi Vu Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-15-100
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9098293350
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/15/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/16/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 79.44 Tons @ 22:45
A brief description of the sample: 3/4" HMA-A SP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: 0345A-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: All American Asphalt — Corona

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: 105793
Binder content (%): 4.7
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-15-100-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/10/2026
Date Tested: 06/25/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: james.holloway@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-8846
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) 0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -0.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 98 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 88 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 51 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 35 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 24 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 5.4 %