Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-08-04-11

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1002458 DEA: 09428604 EFIS: 0925000087 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 09-UNKNOWN--unknown
Work Description:
Location Description:
Contractor Name: Unknown
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Daniel Enriquez Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-08-04-11
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (760) 872-5211
Type of Sample: JMF Verification
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 08/04/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 08/04/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 24 boxes
A brief description of the sample: 3/4" HMA
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Griffith Company

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 0.0
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 5

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-04-11-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-25: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 08/11/2026
Date Tested: 08/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: JMF-01
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4283.1 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6507.3 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.54 %
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2224.2 g
Mass Loss 118.6 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 2105.6 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.79 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor no data0 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-04-11-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-25: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 08/11/2026
Date Tested: 08/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: JMF-01
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of Samples 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 1 7306.4 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 2097.7 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8590 grams
Temperature of Water 77.3 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.577
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 160.4 lb/ft^3

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-04-11-3
Test Method: AASHTO T269-24E25: Standard Method of Test for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Asphalt Mixtures (Air Void)
Verified Date: 08/11/2026
Date Tested: 08/11/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: JMF-01. Voids Failed. Spec is 2.5% - 5.5%
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
Percent Air Voids 6.2 %
Percent Air Voids 2 6.2 %
Percent Air Voids 3 6 %
Average Percent Air Voids 6.1 %

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-04-11-4
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 08/11/2026
Date Tested: 08/07/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: JMF-01
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Bulk Specific Gravity 2.417
Bulk Specific Gravity 2 2.418
Bulk Specific Gravity 3 2.422
Average Bulk Specific Gravity 2.419

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-08-04-11-7
Test Method: AASHTO T30-25: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/11/2026
Date Tested: 08/10/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D09 - Bishop Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 500 South Main Street,
Organization City: Bishop
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 93514
Organization Email: chris.talbot@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (760) 872-0794
General Comments for this Test: JMF-01 PP Gradation
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) 1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) 0.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 90 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 80 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 53 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 34 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 24 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 3.4 %