Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 993331 DEA: 023H6904 EFIS: 0218000010
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-89-30/R42.1
Work Description: ALMANOR WEST REHAB - ROADWAY REHABILITATION
Location Description: IN PLUMAS COUNTY NEAR CANYON DAM FROM LAKE ALMANOR SPILLWAY TO ROUTE 36.
Contractor Name: DIG IT CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Sergio Mendoza Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-07-07-106
TL Number from the TL Form: 896860
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 07/07/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/08/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 16 boxes of Lime Treated 1/2-inch Type A HMA (eq. PG 64-28)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80266
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Dig It Construction — Sierra Cascade Aggregate and Asphalt Products (Chester, CA)
HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 1/2 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 5.8
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG: PG 64-28M
Binder Supplier: Albina (Klamath Falls, OR)
RAP content (%): 21
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: 1.0% Lime
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/15/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=5.49%,
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3035.8 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4840.4 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1804.6 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.49 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
110.6 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1694 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.47 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.17 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-2
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/09/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmm=2.442
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7330.6 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1513.3 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8224.3 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
78 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.442
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2434.9 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-3
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/10/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmb=2.368
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Bulk Specific Gravity
|
2.372
|
|
Bulk Specific Gravity 2
|
2.367
|
|
Bulk Specific Gravity 3
|
2.366
|
|
Average Bulk Specific Gravity
|
2.368
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-4
Test Method: AASHTO T283-14: Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage (Moisture Content)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/30/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: S₁=180 psi, S₂=168 psi, TSR=93%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Unit system used?
|
SI Units
|
|
Average Dry Tensile Strength
|
180 psi
|
|
Average Wet Tensile Strength
|
168 psi
|
|
Tensile Strength Ratio
|
0.93
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-6
Test Method: AASHTO T269-14: Standard Method of Test for Percent Air Voids in Compacted Dense and Open Asphalt Mixtures (Air Void)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/13/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: AASHTO T 269: Pa=3.4%
Allowed tolerance for air voids is 2.5 – 5.5%.
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Percent Air Voids
|
2.9 %
|
|
Percent Air Voids 2
|
3.1 %
|
|
Percent Air Voids 3
|
3.1 %
|
|
Average Percent Air Voids
|
3 %
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-07-07-106-7
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 08/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/16/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: 2023 Standards do not call for AASTO T30.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
1.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
0.6 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
99 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
95 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
84 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
56 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
40 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
34 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
21 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
15 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
12 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
9.2 %
|
