Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-06-12-79

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 994859 DEA: 021H5904 EFIS: 0216000025 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-96-43.5,57.0
Work Description: REPLACE CULVERTS WITH BRIDGES, STREAMBED RESTORATION, & LANDSCAPING.
Location Description: SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR HAPPY CAMP AT 0.8 MILE WEST OF GORDON\\\\'S FERRY ROAD AND AT PORTUGUESE CREEK
Contractor Name: J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contractor Address: 17400 CLEAR CREEK ROAD, REDDING, CA 96001
Resident Engineer: Nicholas Riddle Structure Rep.: Nicolas Jimenez

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-12-79
TL Number from the TL Form: 896949
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/12/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/12/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 tons
A brief description of the sample: 2 boxes of Lime Treated 3/4-inch Type A HMA (eq. PG 64-28 M)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80228
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: J.F. Shea Construction — Fawndale Rock and Asphalt (Redding, CA)

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number: 1
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: JMF2610002
Binder content (%): 4.7
Virgin binder PG: PG 58-34M
Design binder PG: PG 64-28M
Binder Supplier: Albina (Klamath Falls, OR)
RAP content (%): 24
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: 1.0% Lime
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-12-79-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/23/2026
Date Tested: 06/30/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=4.26%
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3159 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 5269 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2110 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.26 %
Mass Loss 99.1 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 2010.9 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.32 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.12 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-12-79-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/23/2026
Date Tested: 07/01/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gradation appears coarse on the № 4 and 8 sieves.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) 0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) 0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -1.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -1.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -1.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -1.5 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 89 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 78 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 44 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 25 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 5.3 %