Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-06-02-119

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1001153 DEA: 081L3104 EFIS: 0820000020 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-RIV-74-11.8/17.3
Work Description: RHMA (GAP GRADED), REPLACE AC SURF, AND COLD PLANE AC PVMT.
Location Description: RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN LAKE ELSINORE FROM GRAND AVENUE TO ROUTE 15/74 SEPARATION
Contractor Name: R.J. NOBLE COMPANY
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Xavier Avila Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-02-119
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9098293350
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/02/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/03/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 51.47 Tons @ 21:59
A brief description of the sample: RHMA-G SP 1/2"
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: 0284G-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: R.J. Noble Co. — Corona

Material Information

HMA Type: RHMA-G
HMA Grading: 1/2 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: 50R003ARSPWEC
Binder content (%): 7.5
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:
Test results on following page(s): 1

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-02-119-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/17/2026
Date Tested: 06/08/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: james.holloway@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-8846
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) 0.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) 0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) 0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) 0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) 0.9 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 95 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 82 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 43 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 7 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 5.5 %