Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1000481 DEA: 081C07U4 EFIS: 0824000168
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-RIV-74-27.5/34.3
Work Description: RUBBERIZED HMA, FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS, AND COLD PLANE AC PAVEMENT.
Location Description: RIVERSIDE COUNTY AT AND NEAR ROMOLAND AND HOMELAND FROM BONNIE DRIVE TO WINCHESTER ROAD
Contractor Name: GRIFFITH COMPANY
Contractor Address: 12200 Bloomfield Avenue, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Resident Engineer: Omar Sanchez Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-30-57
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9512323690
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/30/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/30/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 762.1 Tons @ 12:33pm
A brief description of the sample: RHMA-G SP 3/4"
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: 0382G-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Martin Marietta — Lake Elsinore
DIME Test ID: 2026-06-30-57-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/15/2026
Date Tested: 07/10/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: prakash.gowda@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-3690
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
0.1 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
98 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
88 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
66 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
32 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
20 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
9 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
3.9 %
|